Re: Literary titles & formatting
by Kynn Bartlett <kynn-hwg(at)idyllmtn.com>
|
Date: |
Thu, 24 Jan 2002 14:34:14 -0800 |
To: |
Liz Roberts <liz(at)netlogix.net>, <aware-techniques(at)hwg.org> |
References: |
netlogix |
|
todo: View
Thread,
Original
|
|
At 4:38 PM -0500 1/24/02, Liz Roberts wrote:
>Glad to see the traffic increase so dramatically!
>
>Quick question: when indicating a book title, is <em> or <i> better?
I tend to use <cite> with appropriate styles if necessary.
Because there is not a <booktitle> element, you have to use the
element that is closest in meaning _and_ which does not mean
something else.
In this case, <em> means something else -- emphasis -- so between
<i> and <em>, <i> is preferred because it is meaning-neutral. It
is pure presentation and contains no semantic information. This is
as appropriate as using <span class="booktitle"> around the title,
and setting the style using CSS, but the CSS approach is probably
better as <i> has been abused in the past.
So I would rank those in order from "best" to "worst":
<cite>
<span class="booktitle"> plus CSS rules
<i>
<em>
--Kynn
--
Kynn Bartlett <kynn(at)idyllmtn.com> http://kynn.com
Chief Technologist, Idyll Mountain http://idyllmtn.com
Web Accessibility Expert-for-hire http://kynn.com/resume
January Web Accessibility eCourse http://kynn.com/+d201
Forthcoming: Teach Yourself CSS in 24 Hours
HWG: hwg-basics mailing list archives,
maintained by Webmasters @ IWA